Going back in time again and look at another example. Do you remember when home video viewing first came out? You relied on that hard- to- load piece of junk BETA player for your movie entertainment. At the time, most people were satisfied with that since that was all we had. Then came laser disc players, VHS players, then DVD, and now Blu-Ray. Who has purchased a new DVD player with all the bells and whistles, only to realize you should have just gone with the Blu-Ray player all along?
Now the rapid development of new mobile communication devices is just a small example of a never ceasing cycle of turning out new and better products at lightning speed. This really is just the tip of the iceberg. On a larger scale, you have the entire electronics industry that is set on a mission to produce more and more electronic gadgets that are smaller, faster, have more features and greater visual appeal.
Back in the day, you had a very limited selection of products to choose from. Mobile communication devices like the walkie talkie and earlier phones were big, bulky, and quite heavy. I mean the batteries back then weighed more than two of todays cell phones put together. Oh, and what about reception? Do you remember those long antennas that had to be extended in order to get a decent signal? Seems like ages but actually that time was not too long ago. Nowadays you have 3G and 4G cell phones equipped with wireless internet connections and that are small enough to fit into the palm of your hand.
Take todays flat screen TVs for example. Today you could have the sweetest set on the market and within a year you will probably be trying to sell it to a friend to get enough money to buy a newer model that has higher resolution or more enhanced features.
While the current models of these devices are nice and do a great deal to enhance our lives, we still seem to be driven by a force that leads us on a never ending quest to buy the latest and greatest gadgets. Its like we are fighting an endless battle to keep up with all the latest electronics on the market. For example, look at the rapid evolution of mobile communication devices and the way consumers rushed to buy the newest stuff on the market - and for a good reason.
The other week we did the dirty and compared the specs of Google’s Pixel 3a and its latest budget model, the 4a. And now? Well, we’re gonna do something similar, but —excitingly — different.
So, welcome one and all to the latest specs battle: the Pixel 4a vs OnePlus Nord! Yes, this is a place where we select a few specs and whack them on some graphs.
Why, you ask? Why? Why?! I’m not legally obligated to answer that.
Before we start though, a quick note: specs aren’t everything. Making a great phone takes a lot more than ramming numbers together. So all this is a bit of fun.
Oh, and one more thing, if you’re on mobile and can’t see the charts, either open the page directly in your browser, or request the desktop version of the site.
Let’s begin the Google Pixel 4a vs OnePlus Nord battle with… a battery comparison
A nice easy one to start with! The 4a comes with a 3,140 mAh battery and the Nord with a 4,115 mAh. Let’s see how that looks on a graph, shall we?
Well, that’s not a surprise, the phone with the bigger battery has the larger chart. God, I love graphs.
To put a bit more knowledge on you, the OnePlus Nord’s battery capacity is a 31% increase over the Pixel 4a’s. Isn’t that nice?
What about weight?
Before we throw this graph in the mix, we should also look at the dimensions of the devices in the Google Pixel 4a vs OnePlus Nord scrap.
Google’s device measures: 144 x 69.4 x 8.2 mm
While OnePlus‘ comes in at: 158.3 x 73.3 x 8.2 mm
We can see that the Pixel 4a is quite a bit shorter and narrower, meaning we should expect the OnePlus Nord to be heavier.
And it is!
But this is an interesting bit of bro maths: should it be?
Well, let’s find the volume of both phones. The Pixel 4a clocks in at 81,947.52 mm³ and the OnePlus Nord at 95,147.80 mm³. Now… what happens if we divide those figures by their respective weights?
The Pixel 4a comes to 573.1 mm³ per gram, while the OnePlus Nord clocks in at 517.11 mm³ per gram. Effectively, the OnePlus Nord is marginally denser than Google’s Pixel 4a. Aren’t you glad we worked that out?
Another interesting element of the Google Pixel 4a vs OnePlus Nord battle, certainly. The former device has a 5.81 inch display, while the latter has a 6.44 inch one.
We can also look at screen-to-body ratio here, with the 4a (83.3%) being bettered (again) by the OnePlus Nord (86.7%). But… what about pixel density?
The Pixel 4a actually comes out in pole position by this metric!
Its screen has a pixel density of 443 ppi compared to 408 ppi on the OnePlus Nord. Of course, there’s always more to a screen than just pixel density — the Nord has an AMOLED while the 4a only has a regular OLED, for example — but it does help show the complexity and misguided-ness of just stacking up specs against each other.
The Google Pixel 4a as a Snapdragon 730 chipset and the OnePlus Nord a Snapdragon 765G. As with most things, the higher number means that it’s a “better” chipset in the OnePlus device.
But let’s dig a bit deeper and look at benchmarks.
A quick note, we got the Geekbench 4 figures for the OnePlus Nord from this Android Authority article. These do not appear on Geekbench’s actual site, which means we’re not at a totally level playing field, but at least it gives us an idea!
In regards to the Google Pixel 4a, I simply pulled its Geekbench scores from here. Anyway, let’s look at it!
Yep, no surprise: the phone with the “better” chipset has better scores. Still, the OnePlus Nord doesn’t blow the Pixel 4a out of the water here, it’s just a bit quicker at completing tasks. How much a day-to-day user will notice this is questionable.
What have we learned from the Google Pixel 4a vs OnePlus Nord battle?
We’ve learned what we always learn: don’t blindly trust stats!
Apart from that, the OnePlus Nord is by the far the superior phone. On paper, at least. It has a bigger screen, battery, and a better chipset. And we didn’t even talk about cameras (the Pixel 4a a single rear lens, while the Nord has four).
This is especially wild when the base model of the Nord ($399) is only $50 more expensive than the Pixel 4a ($349).
But we should be careful.
Let’s take the cameras as an example. In theory, the Nord should be a photography powerhouse, especially when compared with the single lens on the 4a. But that doesn’t appear to be the case in reality. In our review of the OnePlus Nord we found photography was actually one of its weaknesses.
In comparison, the 4a uses the same camera system as the regular Pixel 4, which delivers some of the best photos on a mobile device.
And this is all to do with software — something we struggle to measure in these comparisons.
Google’s Pixel devices have the cleanest version of Android around and, in my experience with them, provide a usability at odds with their low specs. They’re not perfect by any means, but a bloatware-filled phone with better specs doesn’t always deliver a better perceived performance.
I’m not saying that’s what the OnePlus Nord is — for many people this device will be a better buy — keep that in mind.
I guess all I’m saying is basically ignore everything I’ve written and made graphs about. Or don’t. Can’t say I really care.
Anyway… wasn’t the Google Pixel 4a vs OnePlus Nord specs-focused fisticuffs a sight you’ll be telling future generations about? On reflection, don’t answer that.
For more gear, gadget, and hardware news and reviews, follow Plugged on
Published August 19, 2020 — 10:00 UTC